> 1) There's nobody who supports the idea of letting any idea be vetoed by anyone. It's not a belief that people have. No, but many existing systems of governa

> 1) There's nobody who supports the idea of letting any idea be vetoed by anyone. It's not a belief that people have. No, but many existing systems of governance allow (nearly) anyone to raise an objection, thereby delaying the decision making process. If a concerted effort by enough "anyones" is made, a decision can be forcefully delayed long enough that it is essentially halted. For certain processes (e.g. environmental reviews in certain states or municipalities) this entire setup is arguably by design.