4 ms·

We implemented a banner on a website that is using our own Matomo instance, but on a different domain, because some other customer projects use the same Matomo

by ls15 5y ago

We implemented a banner on a website that is using our own Matomo instance, but on a different domain, because some other customer projects use the same Matomo instance. We weren't sure if that counts as owned by a third party, so it was decided to implement the banner. Better be safe than sorry. I don't think that it is always trivially obvious how to correctly comply, like some other comments claim. Especially when you really want to eliminate all legal risk and avoid Abmahnfallen.

martin_a 5y ago
> We weren't sure if that counts as owned by a third party IANAL, but if the people/company running it is the same entity I think you should be fine. Browers on the other hand will only look at the domains and think it's somebody else... So... Yes, better safe than sorry.