> According to the voting market There is no such thing as a "voting market". At the least, where is the skin-in-the-game? or itemised quid-pro-quo? > if they

> According to the voting market There is no such thing as a "voting market". At the least, where is the skin-in-the-game? or itemised quid-pro-quo? > if they were simple to understand The rules of pool are simple to understand, that doesn't mean the game is easy to master. Trading is a matter of predicting the market - that is not what is being described here; is is not being predicted that women pay less for sex, it is known from the market already.