So then it's not a right. It requires compelled labor of yourself or someone else, not something you are granted simply for existing that can be taken away. Ch

So then it's not a right. It requires compelled labor of yourself or someone else, not something you are granted simply for existing that can be taken away. Chattel slaves were compensated with a roof over their head, food, facilities. All their needs were met at the hands of the wealthy. All they had to do in return was work. After all, their owner was entitled to their labor by virtue of paying for them and meeting their needs. Surely the state would never utilize this same reasoning on a populace that's wholly dependent on its provisions. Who determines need? Who determines excess? We don't need restaurants, entertainment, video games, etc. We should just eat nutritionally complete kibble for humans, and all work solely to ensure everyone else's needs are met. > It is, after all, their opulent greed that is strangulating the market and making home ownership difficult to begin with. Prove it. Spoiler: you can't.