I don’t see it to be the general premise of the article. If anything, Shannon’s original work from 1948 seems to lie at the heart of the premise. Problem 1: OS

I don’t see it to be the general premise of the article. If anything, Shannon’s original work from 1948 seems to lie at the heart of the premise. Problem 1: OSI leads to a lot of energy inefficiency. It was formulated in a world where networks were small and climate change was not a major concern. Cross-layer protocol/tech can and should be more easily deployable. The common issue with this and IPv6 is the inability to deploy new stuff on an incremental basis without breaking its core connectivity functionality. Problem 2: Again, I think the article does not specifically call for this. This could be _a_ way to do this. One could do other things that are a cooperation between tx and rx which would also convey the meaning to rx effectively.