2 ms·
Not OP, but the sweet spot is there: For anything under your control, that does not collect personal information, or shares data with third parties, you don't n
by martin_a 5y ago
Not OP, but the sweet spot is there: For anything under your control, that does not collect personal information, or shares data with third parties, you don't need any consent at all.
But you might find it easier (or whatever) to integrate Google Analytics than set up your own Matomo instance, so you'll have to ask the users if they want their data shared with Google.
It's not as complicated as most companies want to portray it.
edit: I had our company website at this point. Locally hosted fonts, no external tracking, own Matomo instance, everything was great and I could finally remove the cookie banner. Then marketing came around the corner, wanted to run paid ads on LinkedIn and Xing, also it was "sooooo comfortable" to link Google Analytics with Google Ads and see how your campaigns perform. Now there are more external scripts than ever, we have Cookiebot (let's see for how much longer :-D) and a cookie banner with the usual settings and lawyer copy on it. I hate it.
- ls15 5y agoWe implemented a banner on a website that is using our own Matomo instance, but on a different domain, because some other customer projects use the same Matomo instance. We weren't sure if that counts as owned by a third party, so it was decided to implement the banner. Better be safe than sorry. I don't think that it is always trivially obvious how to correctly comply, like some other comments claim. Especially when you really want to eliminate all legal risk and avoid Abmahnfallen.
- martin_a 5y ago> We weren't sure if that counts as owned by a third party IANAL, but if the people/company running it is the same entity I think you should be fine. Browers on the other hand will only look at the domains and think it's somebody else... So... Yes, better safe than sorry.