3 ms·
Compared to not having the booster (but being previously vaccinated). >37-fold compared to pre-boost levels It's there in the first paragraph. Why are you doi
by simonh 5y ago
Compared to not having the booster (but being previously vaccinated).
>37-fold compared to pre-boost levels
It's there in the first paragraph. Why are you doing this?
- funcDropShadow 5y agoNeutralising antibody levels are not in a linear correlation with protection from Covid infection or prevention of a severe illness. Lot's of biological measurements have to be interpreted on a log scale. I.e. it is not obvious how much difference that makes. But it definitely improves protection.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- xboxnolifes 5y agoGP didn't ask "compared to what". They said that showing an increase is not relevant without knowing the base value amount (or final value amount). Or hell, what the implications of the increase are in meaningful terms. Is this more than expected from a booster? Less? About the same? I get this is a report to investors so I'm not the target audience, but unless the reader is familiar with the field, it's just "big number increase good".