3 ms·
GP's reasoning is probably: the only plausible way to detect human civilization (and not just our planet, which is already hard enough from a different star) is
by Banana699 5y ago
GP's reasoning is probably: the only plausible way to detect human civilization (and not just our planet, which is already hard enough from a different star) is by it's radio signature, and the oldest radio emissions is from 100 years ago, give or take. Anyone standing outside of a sphere whose center is earth and radius is 100 light year hadn't been reached by our oldest detectable-from-space civilization artifacts yet.
It strikes me as a pretty intuitive arguemnt to make and true by default, to show it wrong you have to find or somehow plausibly argue for the existence of some physical medium or process that human civilization (or even earth life in general) emit or modulate in unique, detectable-from-space ways other than electromagnetic waves and that we have been doing this since before radio.
- Retric 5y agoSomething could detect oxygen at longer distances, but that isn’t a sign of intelligent life.
- clem 5y agoAn unaccountably high level of carbon in the atmosphere could be such an indicator.
- Retric 5y agoI think it might be considered evidence, but CO2 levels vary quite a bit over time. Picture what would happen if we measured atmospheric bass on a planet over a few hundred years and saw that kind of swing in CO2. Decidable radio signals on the other hand are far less ambiguous. I just can’t think of much that would be both detectable and a smoking gun.
- Retric 5y ago*gas not bass dam auto corrupt.