When reading the tweet, I get the feeling that it is satire (kind of like the Onion). I am not aware that Tesla is directly financing the vehicles, so why woul

When reading the tweet, I get the feeling that it is satire (kind of like the Onion). I am not aware that Tesla is directly financing the vehicles, so why would they hire a repo person to go repossess it? In addition, given the OTA update capabilities of Tesla, they could probably just remotely disable the car, and not have to worry about the expense of liability of a repo agent. In addition, the picture is weird, as if you had such full control of the car, why would you need to put a "boot" on the car to immobilize it, since it would make driving it back to Tesla harder. I am calling satire on the tweet, until further proof.