This looks like a temporary injunction only and doesn't by itself establish any precedent. IANAL, but my understanding is that the court usually only evaluates

This looks like a temporary injunction only and doesn't by itself establish any precedent. IANAL, but my understanding is that the court usually only evaluates whether that claim of harm is plausible and whether the burden put on the other party is too big to be justified when the final ruling is in their favor. The merits of the main arguments in the case aren't considered - that's what the main trial is for.