3 ms·
Reading many of the comments, it seems most agree that listening at a factor>1 is better. As a fast reader (books, not audio nor video, never really tried that
by plank 5y ago
Reading many of the comments, it seems most agree that listening at a factor>1 is better.
As a fast reader (books, not audio nor video, never really tried that myself) I wonder how this can be understood with the 'common knowledge' that when speaking (presenting) one should slow down.
E.g., let those meaningful pauses endure.
- ghaff 5y agoYou probably get an overrepresentation here of people for whom it's all about maximizing information density. Personally, if that's my objective unless it is a case of a photo (or video) being worth a thousand words, reading is mostly better. With respect to conferences presentations, I'm mostly a fan of shorter (<30 minute) presentations. If something piques my interest, I'll track it down afterwards at my own pace.