3 ms·
The problem is really that we spent 99.7% of our history extremely close to the surface of an extremely large sphere. Space is somewhat less lacking in, like, p
by ravi-delia 5y ago
The problem is really that we spent 99.7% of our history extremely close to the surface of an extremely large sphere. Space is somewhat less lacking in, like, physical obstacles. I mean really, a priori, if there were loads and loads of intelligent species in our galaxy, wouldn't you expect to see them? Why bother positing a brand new set of technologies that just by chance happens to thread whatever needles are necessary to avoid detection, and just figure "oh, guess for some reason there are fewer technological civilizations than I expected"? Obviously we aren't alone in the universe, but it takes some real gymnastics to justify nearby neighbors.
- guerrilla 5y ago> I mean really, a priori, if there were loads and loads of intelligent species in our galaxy, wouldn't you expect to see them? Not according to the Dark Forest theory. There are either quiet civilizations or dead civilizations due to realpolitik. This video summarizes the details[1] 1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xAUJYP8tnRE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xAUJYP8tnRE
- GoblinSlayer 5y agoWe can't see Planet Nine right under our nose, why would we see anything beyond that?