I feel like every one of these should have a "reverse" effect to correct the bias, for the reasons people believe them are sometimes closely related and if a fe

I feel like every one of these should have a "reverse" effect to correct the bias, for the reasons people believe them are sometimes closely related and if a few things were modified the belief would turn out to be right. For example the gambler's fallacy is very closely related to bayesian inference and I suspect that's why a lot of people confuse the two. It'd be very helpful if that was pointed out next to each box.