4 ms·
Honest question, why did you have to go ad hominem? If you look at her papers she’s obviously well versed in QFT and GR. You may disagree with her philosophical
by geertj 5y ago
Honest question, why did you have to go ad hominem? If you look at her papers she’s obviously well versed in QFT and GR. You may disagree with her philosophical views but making the case that she doesn’t understand QM doesn’t pass the smell test.
- myridium 5y agoI didn't commit an ad hominem fallacy. I did not say that her blog is invalid because of her character. I was just commenting on her character (actually more so on her work tbh). i.e. an insult is not an ad hominem. This is an ad hominem: "Your argument is wrong because <insult to character>." This is not an ad hominem: "<insult to character. Particularly an insult that they often wrong>"