4 ms·
> Clearview sought to suggest the company is not subject to the GDPR — although the regulation is extraterritorial in scope, meaning it is applicable and (at le
by kmlx 5y ago
> Clearview sought to suggest the company is not subject to the GDPR — although the regulation is extraterritorial in scope, meaning it is applicable and (at least in theory) enforceable outside the EU’s borders in instances when EU people’s data has been processed in violation of the rules.
GDPR applies also outside of the EU? who exactly thought this one up? how can the EU possibly think it can enforce this and does the EU think europeans should be subject some special rules when in a foreign country?
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- donkarma 5y agoif you murder someone in the United States and fly back to the UK then they'll sure as hell try to extradite you
- ahupp 5y agoYou generally can't be extradited unless it's considered a crime in both places.
- UncleEntity 5y agoBecause they’d be violating US law…
- onphonenow 5y agoWhich is fine because under UK law murder is a crime. The US does not have GDPR. The US has no law giving weight to these data commissioner orders (which appear to target US companies)