4 ms·
I would pay money for a Haskell that wasn’t always backwards compatible and got rid of the old and useless or old and broken things like head and etc. As it is
by ok_dad 5y ago
I would pay money for a Haskell that wasn’t always backwards compatible and got rid of the old and useless or old and broken things like head and etc. As it is I really want to like Haskell, but it’s too hard to separate the wheat from the chaff.
- throwaway81523 5y agoYou might try a newer Haskell dialect like Purescript.
- ok_dad 5y agoI tried it but the tooling was not great. No IDE support last time I used it and it only compiles to JS.
- throwaway81523 5y agoIdris maybe? I agree Purescript's npm dependence makes it unattractive, but it does have some other backends besides JS. I haven't worried about IDE's much for Haskell. They just haven't seened important.