> I'm curious, though, what other shells offer 'quality of life improvements' To be honest most alt of them do. Bash has enough footguns to incapacitate a smal

> I'm curious, though, what other shells offer 'quality of life improvements' To be honest most alt of them do. Bash has enough footguns to incapacitate a small army. Seasoned users like ourselves know how to mitigate them but using a shell that doesn’t require a conscious effort to support spaces in file names and other really basic things is one less piece of mental overhead I need to consider when working. > and can I convince my colleagues to install it everywhere? I’m not sure what you mean here. Are you trying to convince your colleagues to switch so you all use the same shell or saying you still spend a lot of time in remote SSH sessions? Either way, it sounds like you’re probably best sticking with Bash if those are your requirements. My remote workflow is largely API driven (serverless) and the few times I do need to SSH into a remote instance it’s usually just to perform basic tasks. The real meat of my console work is done locally these days.