4 ms·
There is extremely weak proof and all the crowd here has very predictable anti chrome response even though it has nothing to do with chrome. I think the domain
by YetAnotherNick 5y ago
There is extremely weak proof and all the crowd here has very predictable anti chrome response even though it has nothing to do with chrome. I think the domain is checking whether there is camera and mic present not turning it on and accessing content.
- luckylion 5y agoWhat are you talking about? chrome is being mentioned by two people besides yourself and neither mention is negative. Did you even read the comments before commenting about their predictability?
- denton-scratch 5y agoI don't use Chrome, and I don't give a sh*t about it. What I care about is ad networks, and the websites that vomit those ads into the browsers of their visitors. <mode style="grumpy-old-man"> I simply won't have it. At the moment, with FF, an adblocker and a JS blocker, I think I'm hard to track (but certainly not impossible). If my blockers get blocked, I can live without the WWW. Be careful, Goo! You may own the web, but the web doesn't own us. As someone once said, "It's just a fad". </mode>