> ultra-rich are grossly (I'd argue an order of magnitude) undertaxed right now Couldn't agree more on that point. I don't however think earmarking 1.7T for a

> ultra-rich are grossly (I'd argue an order of magnitude) undertaxed right now Couldn't agree more on that point. I don't however think earmarking 1.7T for a very select 12% of Americans that have a far higher than average earning potential fixes the problem with the policy though. That 1.7T could be used in far broader more equal ways.