This is extremely misleading. Tridge was not bound by BT's licensing terms so he could not have violated them. git was developed because developers of BT stopp

This is extremely misleading. Tridge was not bound by BT's licensing terms so he could not have violated them. git was developed because developers of BT stopped licensing it to Linux kernel developers with special terms, and Linus needed something as powerful. I see it as Tridge simply accelerating the natural course of events, not actually causing them.