> A state actor will have less trouble breaking into a mail server I run Only if they have a good reason to target you, personally. But if we are talking abou

> A state actor will have less trouble breaking into a mail server I run Only if they have a good reason to target you, personally. But if we are talking about mass surveillance, attacking a large provider is incredibly *cheaper*: spend one million dollars on 0-days to gain access to one million mailboxes, or one billion to intercept submarine cables and backdoor CPUs and gain access to one billion mailboxes. There is no way to attack somebody's personal, custom mailserver with a budget of $1.