4 ms·
“Insult to evolution” is not a viable moral argument.
by garmaine 5y ago
“Insult to evolution” is not a viable moral argument.
- tablespoon 5y ago> “Insult to evolution” is not a viable moral argument. So? The point was your reductio ad absurdum fails. You said "exact same logic" gets you both places, when it doesn't actually, especially once you start adding in real-world complexities.