3 ms·
But in retrospect you guess this was spam would have been incorrect. It was a carefully crafted action by a researcher. Maybe their intuition was actually bette
by iudqnolq 5y ago
But in retrospect you guess this was spam would have been incorrect. It was a carefully crafted action by a researcher. Maybe their intuition was actually better?
- TedDoesntTalk 5y agoIt is spam. Whether or not the author is a researcher or scam artist is irrelevant; it is still spam.