Bitfields are a construct that I use all the time in my work. If Rust chooses not to implement semantics for defining bit-level fields, then it's just harder fo

Bitfields are a construct that I use all the time in my work. If Rust chooses not to implement semantics for defining bit-level fields, then it's just harder for me to accomplish what I need to using Rust. Again, bitfields are something that Ada makes simple, and easy. Granted, I think Ada's syntax for this could be improved. I don't see the relevance in pointing out that the C standard has problems related to bitfields. Rust is supposed to be an improvement upon C.