4 ms·
Nah, I like having immutable syntax be shorter. It makes idiomatic code shorter than code that does a lot of mutating
by ReactiveJelly 5y ago
Nah, I like having immutable syntax be shorter. It makes idiomatic code shorter than code that does a lot of mutating
- saghm 5y agoAgreed! I also like that declaring a mutable binding is extra code beyond a regular binding rather than something the same (or shorter). At least for me, making things immutable by default and then only relaxing it when necessary leads to code that tends to be less buggy, and I suspect this might be true for others as well.