I agree, the argument always seem to be some kind of inductive reasoning stemming from the presumption that unequal representation is not only a bad thing, but

I agree, the argument always seem to be some kind of inductive reasoning stemming from the presumption that unequal representation is not only a bad thing, but causally due to either past or present racist actions. This seems very facile to me, even though there undoubtedly is overlap with the truth. But as to my own view, I remain a meritocrat, despite the the tide that seems to turning against such thinking.