> in this case I have a little bit too much knowledge about the field and I have to say that it's "not even wrong"... it reads like gibberish. Good to know I g

> in this case I have a little bit too much knowledge about the field and I have to say that it's "not even wrong"... it reads like gibberish. Good to know I guess. I should clarify that the information I get actually doesn't have anything to do with the particular topic. It could be gibberish as you say and it would still give me a sense that someone's out there trying to iterate and experimenting with new tech. That in itself is nice to know. As with OLEDs, in a lot of cases it's not gibberish. But I assume some percentage of stories like this are gibberish. It still makes me happy that people are trying push things forward and that someone cared enough to write a story about it.