5 ms·
> poor static compilation or static analysis You're comparing it with python.
by 77pt77 5y ago
> poor static compilation or static analysis
You're comparing it with python.
- fault1 5y agoyes, and python has a large amount of analyzers: https://github.com/typeddjango/awesome-python-typing https://github.com/typeddjango/awesome-python-typing https://github.com/ethanhs/python-typecheckers https://github.com/ethanhs/python-typecheckers though i'd say they are worse than similar tooling in typescript/javascript. julia's tooling is relatively nascent.
- adgjlsfhk1 5y agoJulia has @code_warntype for type checking and Jet.jl for static analysis (and snoopcompile/cthulu for the really advanced stuff). Is there anything those are missing?
- 77pt77 5y agoIf you want those kinds of perks you use a language with a strict typing system, not dynamic typing.