3 ms·
The word inflation is conspicuously missing from your analysis. There's a reason why people bother with stocks instead of just plopping all their money in CDs.
by mechanical_fish 18y ago
The word inflation is conspicuously missing from your analysis. There's a reason why people bother with stocks instead of just plopping all their money in CDs.
(You could buy inflation-adjusted bonds. Last I heard, though, they were running slightly negative yields because of all the other people who want to buy inflation-adjusted bonds.)
The other problem I see here is that this is a steady-state analysis. If you sustain one event that requires you to deplete your capital (like, say, a sudden surge in inflation, a sudden fall in interest rates or market values, an illness... or, god forbid, you decide to get married or have a kid or move to a nicer house) you will immediately suffer an income hit that will require you to go back to work. You should consider budgeting for such things.
Having said that: If you have the discipline to follow this plan, minor holes and all, you'll be in better financial shape than the vast majority of the planet.
(Obligatory investment-book recommendation: William Bernstein, The Four Pillars of Investing.)
- sfamiliar 18y agoyou're quite correct -- there is no mention of inflation. this is mainly because i don't know how to not work. i've tried it. i fail pretty hard at not working. but at the point where you have this steady income, any job you take contributes strongly to your personal wealth -- much more so than if you didn't have the debts settled and the regular income. any extra income from work (that i didn't blow on hats, mind you) would go into a managed fund, most likely an index fund. days like today though happen periodically, and individual stocks require the kind of detail work that isn't cost effective at those amounts. i make more money working than the growth i would see in the stocks having spent the same time on it. all that said, if the current project gets picked up ...