3 ms·
I don't understand why this comment is so high up. It's just really naive to compare mathematica and python on runtime speed as if they're both tools used for t
by mateo1 5y ago
I don't understand why this comment is so high up. It's just really naive to compare mathematica and python on runtime speed as if they're both tools used for the same purpose.
Whether you like their choice of syntax or not, wolframs tools are state of the art on what they do. Just don't hammer your nails in with screwdrivers.
- notfromhere 5y agoWolfram had been trying to push its language as something that can replace python
- mkl 5y agoWolfram literally say Mathematica is intended to be for all computational purposes. From the article: "our vision is a grand one—unify all of computation into a single coherent language".