Most points are actually about community driven software more than open source. Not all of open source is community driven. Opening the source is just that, mak

Most points are actually about community driven software more than open source. Not all of open source is community driven. Opening the source is just that, making the source code available, you don't have to accept pull requests or let anyone else decide what to do. Qt for instance is not community driven, and because it is dual-licensed, it can't be. The other arguments are more acceptable: we want to make money and we think opening the source goes in the way. I don't like it but I understand.