3 ms·
You had my agreement until > (Also screw all Python programmers, what a bunch of losers with their indenting rules and PEPs. Weirdos. Whenever you hear somone
by heresie-dabord 5y ago
You had my agreement until
> (Also screw all Python programmers, what a bunch of losers with their indenting rules and PEPs. Weirdos. Whenever you hear somone say Python is good or interesting, run.)
Even as a jest, it's a poor representation for the Perl language.
Python has problems but has enjoyed success for a few reasons.[1] I think one of the worst side-effects of Python is that Python programmers tend to look at any powerful language with disdain if it has any non [a-zA-Z] characters. "Can't we just replace everything with Python?!"
Becoming a language bigot -- or joking like one -- does not help.
Perl can stand very tall on its expressiveness, stability, speed and simplicity.
[1] I'm going to say...
a) Python is more readable, but makes the crazy compromise of using whitespace as logic.
b) Python has adequate threading for many use-cases.
c) Python's built-in OOP has better affordance than Perl5 OOP. BUT... Perl enables building anything you want. If you want a dictionary with only two methods, you can build it. And Perl5 will have a more modern OOP implementation.
- bmn__ 5y ago> it's a poor representation for the Perl language. The Python people started this fight in 2000 and have since said much worse and heaps more, most of it untrue and libellous; turn-around is only fair. Those who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.
- phlakaton 5y agoThere is no more a well-defined “Python people” than there is a “Perl people” – both of their user bases span industries and computing architectures, hobbyists and professionals, old bones and young bloods, true believers and weary journeymen – and they overlap significantly, for that matter. Talk about cutting off your nose to spite your face.
- Grinnz 5y agoSinking to their level doesn't move anyone forward.