4 ms·
Chrome does support jxl animation. In my opinion, it's not the compression density that is the main reason to upgrade to jxl, but the higher fidelity, includin
by jonsneyers 5y ago
Chrome does support jxl animation.
In my opinion, it's not the compression density that is the main reason to upgrade to jxl, but the higher fidelity, including wide gamut and HDR.
- ksec 5y agoI am thinking of website like 512kb.club. That is the trade off I am struggling to have a firm opinion. Because I want both higher quality and crazy fast web site. Outside the context of Web, JPEG XL win hands down. To the point I think all HEIF on iPhone should convert to JPEG XL.
- jonsneyers 5y agoI think progressive decode is a great way to combine a fast loading experience with higher image quality. By the time you can look at the details, the full image is loaded, but the page will look ready very fast (since you can already show a reasonable preview with only 10% of the data transferred).