3 ms·
> It can still be considered a "derived" work Incorrect. It cannot, unless they copy it. You may freely take inspiration from GPL works. The GPL is not a paten
by junon 5y ago
> It can still be considered a "derived" work
Incorrect. It cannot, unless they copy it. You may freely take inspiration from GPL works. The GPL is not a patent.
- randomNumber7 5y agoProof? Are you a lawyer or a judge?
- junon 5y agoNo. I've read the license text though, and I've read countless articles on the GPL. You are welcome to research it yourself to confirm this if you'd like.
- randomNumber7 5y agoBut you heard of google vs oracle, right? The curt didn't answer the question if reimplementing the api was copyright infringement.... It only ruled it's fair use (under the assumption it was copyright infringement).