2 ms·
That’s the part about this whole debate I don’t get. That it seems neither side is willing to accept we’ll never have an answer to that. You can’t actually kno
by SV_BubbleTime 5y ago
That’s the part about this whole debate I don’t get.
That it seems neither side is willing to accept we’ll never have an answer to that. You can’t actually know when life is or isn’t. Yet everything is an attack to someone.
How do we make non-falsifiable claims and objective laws either way? “You aren’t a person until mommy says so” seems just as troublesome as “ending anything that could be a person is always murder”.
I feel like I’m crazy for understanding both sides and not being hardline.
- WFHRenaissance 5y ago> How do we make non-falsifiable claims and objective laws either way? “You aren’t a person until mommy says so” seems just as troublesome as “ending anything that could be a person is always murder”. You don't ;). Just gotta pick a value system and kind of push for your team to win. If you're in the US, we've kind of been operating in this BS emotivistic meta-ethical framework for like 70 years and I doubt we'll escape it any time soon. We'd need re-education camps in order to come to a consensus on a value system...