3 ms·
This is totally wrong. It must be an explicit offer for source. " 3. You may copy and distribute the Program (or a work based on it, under Section 2) in object
by DannyBee 5y ago
This is totally wrong.
It must be an explicit offer for source.
"
3. You may copy and distribute the Program (or a work based on it, under Section 2) in object code or executable form under the terms of Sections 1 and 2 above provided that you also do one of the following:
...
b) Accompany it with a written offer, valid for at least three years, to give any third party, for a charge no more than your cost of physically performing source distribution, a complete machine-readable copy of the corresponding source code, to be distributed under the terms of Sections 1 and 2 above on a medium customarily used for software interchange; or,
"
Note accompany it.
The only exception is this:
"If distribution of executable or object code is made by offering access to copy from a designated place, then offering equivalent access to copy the source code from the same place counts as distribution of the source code, even though third parties are not compelled to copy the source along with the object code.
"