For some reason this article irritates me on some internal level. It seems to almost completely disregard any language that isn't mainstream at this moment -- e

For some reason this article irritates me on some internal level. It seems to almost completely disregard any language that isn't mainstream at this moment -- essentially making your options for the next 10 years just a rearrangement of the same crap we're stuck with today. The only somewhat exciting thing in that list is F#; but if a rehash of 15 year old language that was based on another 10 year old language is our most "refreshing" option for the future, then screw everything about the next 10 years. Also, another annoyance: .NET is not a language.