Your claim I was responding to is this: “Could be interpreted as preventing proper discussion about what caused the Tulsa massacre” > If you think it's okay to

Your claim I was responding to is this: “Could be interpreted as preventing proper discussion about what caused the Tulsa massacre” > If you think it's okay to censor particular views because they're obviously wrong or misguided... you're totally free to hols that view, but that's still censorship. It’s a false claim to say that these bills ‘censor’ particular views. That is the lie. They seek to prevent certain views being taught as fact that can’t be debated. I.e. the bills do the opposite of what you assert.