this chart is helpful and glad it's been made to keep the conversation going in a better direction. Sadly due to what I consider terrible editorial controls, I

this chart is helpful and glad it's been made to keep the conversation going in a better direction. Sadly due to what I consider terrible editorial controls, I feel we need to move to a chart that shows more details, and even goes to actual reporter/writer level and editor level. Also in the age of Trump and Bernie - we likely need to chart 'those for / those against' these two specifically - as there are plenty on the 'right' and 'left' side of the news that are against them. I'd like a browser extension that can highlight a crowd sourced plusses and minusses of each individual writer. In some ways I have found the trust placed in the middle, like chart shows abc/cbs/bbc/npr near middle.. this is when the most damage is done.. like when I watched a nora odonel about 2 years ago - a fair and balanced reporting for about 55 minutes - lots of facts, not much fluff.. then the last 5 minutes one fact and a hard slant to be anti-trump story.. what makes this so bad is that she/they really try to say they are proper reporting, so it makes the propaganda pieces they add in 100x worse imho.. at least if you watch enough of the reidOut or newsmax (going by the chart) - you get a sense that they are totally skewering the stories with no balance at all attempted - and I think it becomes obvious that are working more like the enquirer - it's more tribal circle jerking entertainment than real facts.. When a place stands as an arbiter of truth and fairness and balance and they sprinkle just little bits of slant it's worse I believe.