4 ms·

“no tolerance for illegal deforestation" Under whose law?

• _Microft 5y ago
  Actually this does not really matter a lot. It could be totally legal and a company could still decide that it does not want to sell beef produced like that and then it is just like that.
  • belval 5y ago
    I'm not a big free market guy, but this is basically "the free market" in action. The supermarket knows it can get cheap beef from elsewhere, and knows that there is profit in taking a public stand against deforestation. The result is this and frankly it seems right to me.
  • jeegsy 5y ago
    Whether it matters or not is besides the point. The attached article claims that these supermarket chains will no longer source from farmers that engage in 'illegal' deforestation in Brazil. It is therefore reasonable to ask illegal under whose law? Brazil? UN? UK?. I thought I asked a reasonable question. I'm not sure what the downVs are about.
• felix_n 5y ago
  The Law of the Jungle