4 ms·

I second this. Triageing feeds is the way to go. Also don't think you can read it all.

• akkartik 15y ago
  I think you're missing his point: he separates his feeds into high- and low-volume, and is willing to triage the high-volume subset without missing out on the rest. I've been doing something similar for a couple of years now. I built http://readwarp.com http://readwarp.com to manage my high-volume sites, and now my google reader's dropped from 1500 feeds to 100 low-volume must-see feeds that generate 10 stories a day.
  • voidfiles 15y ago
    Yea, I don't think I did mis-understand the comment, but I glad you found a place to plug your site.
    • akkartik 15y ago
      Wow, that is some nasty sarcasm you've got there. Readwarp's an ancient hobby that I don't work on anymore. Did it seem like I was trying to convert traffic? We all know how to build landing pages with big, bright call-to-action buttons, you know. I've long since pruned most features on the site. There's no way to import feeds, etc. It only really works for me anymore. I linked to it because it's hard to make sense of custom reading solutions without pointers to try them out.
      • deleted 15y ago
        [deleted]