4 ms·
Sounds like you have a bad recruiter. (2) is a situation that should never happen, as they get paid by a percentage of your base salary. That said, it also so
by colinsidoti 15y ago
Sounds like you have a bad recruiter. (2) is a situation that should never happen, as they get paid by a percentage of your base salary.
That said, it also sounds like you're in a situation where it's incredibly difficult to negotiate. I'd say take whatever they give you and kick ass at your job. You'll build up your resume, and in a few months if you believe your underpaid, you'll have something to negotiate with. Moreover, with something substantial on your resume you won't have any trouble moving elsewhere.
If you're worried about your recruiter, I'd recommend calling TTS Staffing and asking for Morgan, he's the best that I've dealt with in New York.
- wpietri 15y ago> Sounds like you have a bad recruiter. (2) is a situation that should never happen, as they get paid by a percentage of your base salary. You sure? Situations like that are ripe for recruiters lowballing the hires. Why? Because the recruiter can get many commissions from a steady client, but only gets one commission from the employee. As long as they can make it up on volume, there's a real incentive to be a slack negotiator.
- bostonpete 15y agoEven if the recruiter never plans to do business with the employer again, his interest aren't fully aligned with the job seeker. The recruiter has a strong incentive to the the seeker hired -- regardless of salary -- because if he gets ends up taking a different position, the recruiter may get nothing.
- salemh 15y agoYes, 90 day guarantee's and all that. But, its true, the incentive is to CLOSE the deal vs closing at the most optimal for the candidate (a % of the fee vs 0% of the fee).