Two things worth noting. First, this is dated from the November 2nd. Second, as has been pointed out by other commenters, this article is worth reading: https:/

Two things worth noting. First, this is dated from the November 2nd. Second, as has been pointed out by other commenters, this article is worth reading: https://leadstories.com/hoax-alert/2021/11/fact-check-british-medical-journal-did-not-reveal-disqualifying-and-ignored-reports-of-flaws-in-pfizer-vaccine-trial.html https://leadstories.com/hoax-alert/2021/11/fact-check-britis... Unfortunately, the research misconduct that the BMJ letter points to plays right into the hands of anti-vaxxers and anti-science types. Science hard, science communication is even harder, but how is the hardest part caring enough to do the research right? Edit: As has been pointed out, I got the date wrong! This is dated as of 12/17.