Re: the docs, I find your assertion puzzling, or at least, incompatible with this quote: > [OCaml's] clear expressiveness made it possible for code reviews to

Re: the docs, I find your assertion puzzling, or at least, incompatible with this quote: > [OCaml's] clear expressiveness made it possible for code reviews to be performed [at Jane Street] by traders who were not programmers If OCaml was a mess, difficult to understand, or had terrible docs, what the quote describes just wouldn't be possible. Non-programmers doing code reviews! What could be more pragmatic than that?