4 ms·
You are implying the false pretense that the person you are replying to is arguing that Web3 technology is being properly valued and therefore should be used ri
by mattwilsonn888 5y ago
You are implying the false pretense that the person you are replying to is arguing that Web3 technology is being properly valued and therefore should be used right now! What an easy strawman to knock over - what they are actually saying is that the vision and promise of this emerging technology layer has obvious value compared to today's standard. Man that latter statement is a real thinker in comparison.
- DannyBee 5y agoYour sarcasm actually doesn't fix anything, but, for all your sarcasm, you apparently didn't read very carefully. I pointed out it appears to not solve any problem that currently exists, yes. But I also qualified it by saying it doesn't solve a problem that people seem likely to have anytime soon, ie the future, either. So the latter statement you try to prop up doesn't change anything - it does not have obvious value compared to today's standard, but it also doesn't have obvious value in the future, either. So no, the latter statement is not a thinker in comparison. In fact, as i said elsewhere, there appears to have been zero diligence on product/market fit. This appears to be something that was done because they could, not because anyone actually seems to want it. Good luck on turning that vision that solves nobody's problem into a thing anyone cares about!
- mattwilsonn888 5y agoYes yes the board that vies for more sovereign web architecture and values user control and consent cannot grasp the vision behind Web3. And you wonder why sarcasm is all the energy you are worth.