5 ms·

Name a single one

• guipsp 5y ago
  https://www.kjrh.com/news/local-news/oklahoma-lawmaker-proposes-bill-restricting-teaching-on-race-slavery https://www.kjrh.com/news/local-news/oklahoma-lawmaker-propo...
  • trothamel 5y ago
    This doesn't ban discussion of the sort we're having here.
  • NikolaeVarius 5y ago
    In the very slim chance that this bill might ban talking about the Tulsa race massacre, I actually read the dumb thing. This is just anti-CRT/adjacent shit, it in no way prevents anyone from talking about the Tulsa race massacre. And even if it DID talk about Tulsa, its mentioning it Teaching it in schools, so your original claim STILL doesn't apply. Try harder
  • chmod600 5y ago
    Controlling how classroom time is managed is not suppression of speech. The teacher can't spend the whole day preaching the gospel, either, and that doesn't amount to suppression of religion. It may not be the best example of the U.S. remembering its failures, but it's nowhere close to what China does to force people to forget.
• WarOnPrivacy 5y ago
  Did you want to make sure it's the same one, that your preferred media outlets are talking about? It's more than one. https://duckduckgo.com/?q=legislature+bill+crt&t=h_&ia=web https://duckduckgo.com/?q=legislature+bill+crt&t=h_&ia=web
  • mrtranscendence 5y ago
    ? Banning the teaching of critical race theory in schools is not the same thing as banning any discussion of the Tulsa race massacre.
    • geofft 5y ago
      I didn't claim it bans "any discussion." I claimed it bans "honest and uncensored discussion."