I don't intend to appear enraged; that's certainly not the case! (I'm amused and sarcastic, if anything.) I know it's a tangent, but if you could explain why yo

I don't intend to appear enraged; that's certainly not the case! (I'm amused and sarcastic, if anything.) I know it's a tangent, but if you could explain why you have this perception, I'd be grateful. > that a specific open-source project you chose It was but an example; I assert the rest are also like that. I chose Bitcoin because it is the biggest, but I could just as easily have chosen Ethereum (as I have already said). > doesn't have good enough documentation for a specific feature you want, which is not the main aim of the project. If not making transactions, blocks, and mining, what is the main aim of Bitcoin? > Additionally, all the answers to your question are contained in my first comment. You provided a link to the documentation for Solidity, one of many high-level languages over the Ethereum VM. While it provides a little documentation of Ethereum bytecode, and a high-level overview of how Ethereum is used to handle smart contracts, this isn't Ethereum documentation. The answers are not to be found there. (And I don't expect you to help; I'm aware that the answers aren't easy to find. That's my whole point!)