3 ms·
I don’t know much about SLAs, but isn’t it simply business risk? If they Can’t meet their SLA and are only up 99.99% then they might give a 50% discount to the
by mettamage 5y ago
I don’t know much about SLAs, but isn’t it simply business risk?
If they Can’t meet their SLA and are only up 99.99% then they might give a 50% discount to the customer. It could be a risk they dare to take since they might have figured out in practice that AWS is up far more often and that the chance of not meeting their own SLA is one in twenty years. So on average, it would mean they will have 97.5% of their revenue, since in one year (on average) they wouldn’t meet their SLA and give a 50% discount (contributing 2.5% instead of 5% over a 20 year total). I assumed no company growth, for the sake of my example.
Just brainstorming
- runnerup 5y agoOr potentially they could have multi-cloud failover and have decided there aren't enough co-dependent failures to push them under their SLA. I'd personally assume your interpretation is most correct though.
- dorongrinstein 5y agoAWS can be completely down, or portions of it like Route 53. We leverage triple redundancies to avoid failure and provide extreme high availability.