Link to the actual paper here: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2112.08910.pdf https://arxiv.org/pdf/2112.08910.pdf Edit after having read it: It's short and easy to read

Link to the actual paper here: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2112.08910.pdf https://arxiv.org/pdf/2112.08910.pdf Edit after having read it: It's short and easy to read, I would suggest reading it instead of the article linked. I think that more work should be needed before making suggestions. For example, is there a correlation between the "number of words" and the gendering of a resume? Maybe something like "I was the manager of the soap team for 3 years, during which sales increased by 25.6%" compared to "2012-2015: soap team manager". Though this convey less informations. Maybe a KPI box for each job? Another thing that I would have liked would be to compare that to what actual recruiters can do. If a simple model can do 0.75 and a regular recruiter 0.53, it's not the same as if a recruiter does 0.92. Lastly, the "list of gender indicating words" seems really small. Just 26 words for 348k resume.