But curation is the work nobody wants to pay for now, isn't it? "Calories" and "caloric cost" is a funny measure of value. Especially ironic given that from a

But curation is the work nobody wants to pay for now, isn't it? "Calories" and "caloric cost" is a funny measure of value. Especially ironic given that from a nutritional perspective, they're what the poor get too much of and the rich do their best to avoid. In the information-nutritional world, dross ("empty calories") is what FAANG throws at the plebeians to milk them of their money ("caloric value"?). So yeah, now it makes sense: You've got your "valuable" and "not valuable" bass-ackwards; what you come off as valuing highly is the offal that the rich throw to the poor.